Apart congratulate myself for this ingenious and subtle way, I want to talk about something quite serious uan
I have always had the idea that in this world after thousands of years of wars, tyranny, revolution and other things we had very little bloody decided to organize (At least most of us) in a democracy because we saw the government by more than one person, determined by us, as a form of security, in short, should be the "creme de la creme" of the country, in theory.
Rather than sink the shot in the underbelly of Italian politics, which gets along very well to discredit itself, I wanted to go into another concept: that of state enterprises. That
taking as good a definition of the first appears to be correct the next step, namely to protect the citizens of a country, by introducing in the market, per se danger as we have seen recently, we are still paying the consequences of the "strong points" or State-controlled companies that worked to provide a service to its citizens, maybe not very competitive with other companies on the market but in theory if nothing else, should ensure the safety and quality of service.
But this is just a mere theory, because in fact state-owned companies now do not exist anymore, they are dying one after another because someone decides that the upper floors are not going well or maybe they are a burden on public budgets ( thing that I can agree, but maybe spend 2 money today to reorganize and make them work and make it 4 in the future?) and then sold. So essential services such as transport and communications and now seems well water are sold off to private. With a double loss, because we not only lose a (relative) safety we now see in the hands of a single private tremendous power, as is the case of Trenitalia to Telecom or the various Italian highways, they have also inherited a network, built with taxpayers' money, which now puts them in a de facto monopoly.
Well, I'm afraid. In a world where banks fail and every day on the news because some workers on strike will not be sent home a state less and less reliable and credible is stripped of its latest property to cash in, and we'll have him drop his trousers.
That someone is doing it with an ulterior motive? Nooo, but I figured!
0 comments:
Post a Comment